Pehmeä lakritsi vs Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet
Overall, Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pehmeä lakritsi | Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 310 kcal | 320 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 48 g | 47 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pehmeä lakritsi has 45% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has 57% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has 26% more protein (5 g vs 3.7 g).
- Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has the better Nutri-Score.
- Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pehmeä lakritsi lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pehmeä lakritsi
sokeri, VEHNÄjauho, melassi, glukoosisiirappi, lakritsiuute, väri (E153), suola, anisöljy
Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet
Syrup/Syrup. molasses/molasses, wheat flour wheat flour wheat flour, oat bran oat bran, licorice - extract/licorice extract/licorice extract (3%), carbomedicinalis (vegetable charcoal), anise oil/anise oil/anise oil.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pehmeä lakritsi or Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet?
Overall, Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pehmeä lakritsi has fewer calories: 310 kcal versus 320 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fibre Liquorice Soft & Sweet has less sugar: 47 g versus 48 g per 100 g.