Pehmeä lakritsi vs Harlekijntjes Zacht zoete drop
Overall, Harlekijntjes Zacht zoete drop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pehmeä lakritsi | Harlekijntjes Zacht zoete dr... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 310 kcal | 330 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 48 g | 58 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 4.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gelatin, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Harlekijntjes Zacht zoete drop has 50% less fat (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
- Pehmeä lakritsi has no saturated fat, while Harlekijntjes Zacht zoete drop has 0.3 g.
- Pehmeä lakritsi has 17% less sugar (48 g vs 58 g).
- Harlekijntjes Zacht zoete drop has 71% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Harlekijntjes Zacht zoete drop has 24% more protein (4.9 g vs 3.7 g).
- Only Harlekijntjes Zacht zoete drop lists: Gelatin.
Ingredients
Pehmeä lakritsi
sokeri, VEHNÄjauho, melassi, glukoosisiirappi, lakritsiuute, väri (E153), suola, anisöljy
Harlekijntjes Zacht zoete drop
sugar, glucose syrup, modified corn starch, molasses, 4.8% licorice, gelatin (port), wheat flour, ammonium salt, glazing agent: beeswax and carnauba wax, colour: carbo medicinalis vegetabilis, natural anise flavouring,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pehmeä lakritsi or Harlekijntjes Zacht zoete drop?
Overall, Harlekijntjes Zacht zoete drop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pehmeä lakritsi has fewer calories: 310 kcal versus 330 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pehmeä lakritsi has less sugar: 48 g versus 58 g per 100 g.