Comparison

Schoko-Rosinen vs Kirschen in weißer Schokolade

Overall, Schoko-Rosinen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSchoko-RosinenKirschen in weißer Schokolad...
Nutri-Score — e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 425 kcal 308 kcal
Fat 14.7 g 17.3 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 10.3 g
Sugars 65.1 g 33.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 3.5 g 0.5 g
Protein 4.5 g 3.6 g
Additives11
AllergensMilk, SoybeansMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kirschen in weißer Schokolade has 28% fewer calories (308 kcal vs 425 kcal).
  • Schoko-Rosinen has 15% less fat (14.7 g vs 17.3 g).
  • Schoko-Rosinen has 93% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 10.3 g).
  • Kirschen in weißer Schokolade has 49% less sugar (33.5 g vs 65.1 g).
  • Schoko-Rosinen has 85% more fiber (3.5 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Schoko-Rosinen has 20% more protein (4.5 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Only Schoko-Rosinen lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Schoko-Rosinen

Rosinen (44 %), Zucker, Kakaobutter, Kakaomasse, Magermilchpulver, Süßmolkenpulver, Butterreinfett, Glukosesirup, Emulgator: Lecithine (Soja); Bourbon-Vanilleextraktpulver. Kann enthalten: Haselnüsse, andere Schalenfrüchte, Erdnüsse, Gluten.

Kirschen in weißer Schokolade

Weiße Schokolade 51%(zucker, kakaobutter,Vollmilchpulver,Emulgator: Lecithine (aus Soja), natürliches Vanillearoma, Sauerkirschen 49% Kann Spuren von Nüssen und Erdnüssen enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Schoko-Rosinen or Kirschen in weißer Schokolade?

Overall, Schoko-Rosinen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kirschen in weißer Schokolade has fewer calories: 308 kcal versus 425 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kirschen in weißer Schokolade has less sugar: 33.5 g versus 65.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons