Comparison
Schmand vs Smetana
Overall, Smetana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schmand | Smetana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 242 kcal | 204 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.1 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 2.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Smetana has 16% fewer calories (204 kcal vs 242 kcal).
- Smetana has 17% less fat (20 g vs 24 g).
- Smetana has 19% less saturated fat (13 g vs 16.1 g).
- Only Schmand lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Schmand
Milch
Smetana
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schmand or Smetana?
Overall, Smetana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Smetana has fewer calories: 204 kcal versus 242 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Smetana has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.