Comparison
Schmand vs Schmand
Overall, Schmand has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schmand | Schmand |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 242 kcal | 241 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.1 g | 15.8 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schmand has 100% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Schmand
Milch
Schmand
Sauerrahm
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schmand or Schmand?
Overall, Schmand has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schmand has fewer calories: 241 kcal versus 242 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schmand has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.