Comparison
UHT Whipping Cream vs Schmand
Overall, Schmand has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | UHT Whipping Cream | Schmand |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 336 kcal | 241 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 24.1 g | 15.8 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schmand has 28% fewer calories (241 kcal vs 336 kcal).
- Schmand has 31% less fat (24 g vs 35 g).
- Schmand has 34% less saturated fat (15.8 g vs 24.1 g).
- Schmand has 100% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0 g).
- Schmand has 29% more protein (3.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Schmand is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
UHT Whipping Cream
cow's milk, stabilizer E407
Schmand
Sauerrahm
FAQ
Which is healthier: UHT Whipping Cream or Schmand?
Overall, Schmand has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schmand has fewer calories: 241 kcal versus 336 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
UHT Whipping Cream has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.