Comparison
Schmand 24% Fett vs Śmietana 18%
Overall, Śmietana 18% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schmand 24% Fett | Śmietana 18% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 240 kcal | 191 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.3 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Śmietana 18% has 20% fewer calories (191 kcal vs 240 kcal).
- Śmietana 18% has 25% less fat (18 g vs 24 g).
- Śmietana 18% has 33% less saturated fat (11 g vs 16.3 g).
Ingredients
Schmand 24% Fett
Sauerrahm 24 fett aus Biomilch
Śmietana 18%
Śmietanka pasteryzowana, skrobia, kultury bakterii mlekowych.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schmand 24% Fett or Śmietana 18%?
Overall, Śmietana 18% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Śmietana 18% has fewer calories: 191 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schmand 24% Fett has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.