Comparison
Schmand 24% vs Śmietana 18%
Overall, Śmietana 18% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schmand 24% | Śmietana 18% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 243 kcal | 191 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 15.8 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Śmietana 18% has 21% fewer calories (191 kcal vs 243 kcal).
- Śmietana 18% has 25% less fat (18 g vs 24 g).
- Śmietana 18% has 30% less saturated fat (11 g vs 15.8 g).
- Schmand 24% has 100% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0 g).
- Schmand 24% is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Schmand 24%
Bio Sauerrahm
Śmietana 18%
Śmietanka pasteryzowana, skrobia, kultury bakterii mlekowych.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schmand 24% or Śmietana 18%?
Overall, Śmietana 18% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Śmietana 18% has fewer calories: 191 kcal versus 243 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schmand 24% has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.