Comparison
Śmietana 18% vs Schmand 24%
Overall, Śmietana 18% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Śmietana 18% | Schmand 24% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 189 kcal | 243 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 15.8 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Śmietana 18% has 22% fewer calories (189 kcal vs 243 kcal).
- Śmietana 18% has 25% less fat (18 g vs 24 g).
- Śmietana 18% has 24% less saturated fat (12 g vs 15.8 g).
- Schmand 24% has 15% less sugar (3.4 g vs 4 g).
Ingredients
Śmietana 18%
_śmietanka_, żywe kultury bakterii mlekowych.
Schmand 24%
Bio Sauerrahm
FAQ
Which is healthier: Śmietana 18% or Schmand 24%?
Overall, Śmietana 18% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Śmietana 18% has fewer calories: 189 kcal versus 243 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schmand 24% has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 4 g per 100 g.