Comparison

Schinken-m22s Lyoner vs Hot Dog bocadillo

Overall, Hot Dog bocadillo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSchinken-m22s LyonerHot Dog bocadillo
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 263 kcal 232 kcal
Fat 23 g 20 g
Saturated fat 9.2 g 6.7 g
Sugars 1 g 0.6 g
Salt 1.7 g 2 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 13 g 12 g
Additives34
AllergensCelery, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hot Dog bocadillo has 12% fewer calories (232 kcal vs 263 kcal).
  • Hot Dog bocadillo has 13% less fat (20 g vs 23 g).
  • Hot Dog bocadillo has 27% less saturated fat (6.7 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Hot Dog bocadillo has 40% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1 g).
  • Hot Dog bocadillo has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Schinken-m22s Lyoner lists: Celery, Mustard.

Ingredients

Schinken-m22s Lyoner

Schweinefleisch (84 %), Trinkwasser, Schweinespeck, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Dextrose, Gewürze (Chili, Paprika, Zwiebelpulver, Nelken, _Sellerie_, _Senfmehl_), Gewürzextrakte (Pfeffer, Macis, Liebstöckel, Muskatnuss, Zitronen), Stabilisator: Diphosphate; Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit.

Hot Dog bocadillo

Carne separada mecánicamente de pollo, grasa de cerdo, agua, aromas y especias, sal, dextrosa, estabilizantes E-466, E-451 Y E-450), Conservadores (E-262 Y E-250) antioxidante (E-316) aroma de humo,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Schinken-m22s Lyoner or Hot Dog bocadillo?

Overall, Hot Dog bocadillo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hot Dog bocadillo has fewer calories: 232 kcal versus 263 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hot Dog bocadillo has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons