Comparison

Schinken-m22s Lyoner vs Chatar 280 g

Overall, Chatar 280 g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSchinken-m22s LyonerChatar 280 g
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 263 kcal 240 kcal
Fat 23 g 20 g
Saturated fat 9.2 g 7 g
Sugars 1 g 0.2 g
Salt 1.7 g 2.5 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 13 g 11 g
Additives37
AllergensCelery, MustardGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chatar 280 g has 13% less fat (20 g vs 23 g).
  • Chatar 280 g has 24% less saturated fat (7 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Chatar 280 g has 80% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1 g).
  • Schinken-m22s Lyoner has 32% less salt (1.7 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Schinken-m22s Lyoner has 15% more protein (13 g vs 11 g).
  • Only Schinken-m22s Lyoner lists: Celery, Mustard.
  • Only Chatar 280 g lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Schinken-m22s Lyoner

Schweinefleisch (84 %), Trinkwasser, Schweinespeck, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Dextrose, Gewürze (Chili, Paprika, Zwiebelpulver, Nelken, _Sellerie_, _Senfmehl_), Gewürzextrakte (Pfeffer, Macis, Liebstöckel, Muskatnuss, Zitronen), Stabilisator: Diphosphate; Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit.

Chatar 280 g

Chicken mechanically removed meat, WHEAT flour, potato stárch, salt, Soy starch, stabilizer. E450, E451, herbs and spices, flavour, glucose, E301, E331, preservative: E325, E262, E250, coloring agent

FAQ

Which is healthier: Schinken-m22s Lyoner or Chatar 280 g?

Overall, Chatar 280 g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chatar 280 g has fewer calories: 240 kcal versus 263 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chatar 280 g has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons