Comparison

Scamorza blanche vs Fette biscottate malto d'orzo

Overall, Fette biscottate malto d'orzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientScamorza blancheFette biscottate malto d'orz...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 299 kcal 398 kcal
Fat 17 g 6.2 g
Saturated fat 12 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0 g 11 g
Salt 1.1 g 0.8 g
Fiber 0 g 5.7 g
Protein 25 g 11 g
Additives10
AllergensMilkGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Scamorza blanche has 25% fewer calories (299 kcal vs 398 kcal).
  • Fette biscottate malto d'orzo has 64% less fat (6.2 g vs 17 g).
  • Fette biscottate malto d'orzo has 89% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 12 g).
  • Scamorza blanche has no sugar, while Fette biscottate malto d'orzo has 11 g.
  • Fette biscottate malto d'orzo has 100% more fiber (5.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Scamorza blanche has 56% more protein (25 g vs 11 g).
  • Fette biscottate malto d'orzo has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Scamorza blanche is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Fette biscottate malto d'orzo lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Scamorza blanche

_Lait_, sel, présure, correcteur d'acidité: acide citrique.

Fette biscottate malto d'orzo

Farina di frumento, Lievito naturale, Zucchero, Grasso vegetale di palma, Malto d'orzo ed estratto di mais 2., Burro, Latte scremato in polvere, Sale, Malto d'orzo 0., Farina di grano maltato, Aromi

FAQ

Which is healthier: Scamorza blanche or Fette biscottate malto d'orzo?

Overall, Fette biscottate malto d'orzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Scamorza blanche has fewer calories: 299 kcal versus 398 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Scamorza blanche has less sugar: 0 g versus 11 g per 100 g.

More comparisons