Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF vs Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g
Overall, Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF
Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saucisse de Montbéliard cuit... | Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 316 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 11.2 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g has no sugar, while Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF has 1 g.
- Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF has 18% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.2 g).
- Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF
pork, salt, spices, sucrose, dextrose, preservative: sodium nitrite
Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g
Viande de porc - Sel - Epices et plantes aromatiques - Ferments Boyau naturel de porc 114g de viande de porc ont été mis en oeuvre pour fabriquer 100g de produit fini FABRIQUE AVEC DU SEL SANS NITRITE - PRODUIT FABRIQUE A PARTIR D'INGREDIENTS D'ORIGINE NATURELLE
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF or Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g?
Overall, Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g has fewer calories: 316 kcal versus 320 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.