Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g vs Saucisse de Morteau cuite
Overall, Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g
Saucisse de Morteau cuite
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g | Saucisse de Morteau cuite |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 316 kcal | 320 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 11.2 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g has no sugar, while Saucisse de Morteau cuite has 0.5 g.
- Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Saucisse de Morteau cuite lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g
Viande de porc - Sel - Epices et plantes aromatiques - Ferments Boyau naturel de porc 114g de viande de porc ont été mis en oeuvre pour fabriquer 100g de produit fini FABRIQUE AVEC DU SEL SANS NITRITE - PRODUIT FABRIQUE A PARTIR D'INGREDIENTS D'ORIGINE NATURELLE
Saucisse de Morteau cuite
Viande de porc (origine : France), sel, poivre, sucre, dextrose, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, ferments, boyau naturel de porc.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g or Saucisse de Morteau cuite?
Overall, Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g has fewer calories: 316 kcal versus 320 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saucisse de Morteau IGP 250g has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.