Comparison

Sandwich Tomate Mozza vs Mozzarella Sandwich

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSandwich Tomate MozzaMozzarella Sandwich
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 255 kcal 234 kcal
Fat 14.9 g 12 g
Saturated fat 6.4 g 4.6 g
Sugars 2.3 g 2.7 g
Salt 1 g 1.3 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 9.7 g 10 g
Additives30
AllergensGluten, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mozzarella Sandwich has 19% less fat (12 g vs 14.9 g).
  • Mozzarella Sandwich has 28% less saturated fat (4.6 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Sandwich Tomate Mozza has 15% less sugar (2.3 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Sandwich Tomate Mozza has 23% less salt (1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Only Sandwich Tomate Mozza lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Sandwich Tomate Mozza

Pain de mie au _blé_ malté 41 % (farine de _blé_ 19 %, eau, flocon de blé malté toasté 2,09 %, graines (tournesol, millet, pavot lin brun), _gluten_ de _blé_, huile de colza, flocons de _seigle_ malté, sel, levure, dextrose, vinaigre d'alcool, sucre, émulsifiants : E471 et E472e, farine d'_orge_ malté toasté, arôme naturel, farine d'_orge_ malté et torréfié, agent de traitement de la farine : E300) - _mozzarella_ 22 % - tomate 13 % - _fromage_ frais (_fromage_ frais, sel) - préparation à base de basilic 5.0 % (huile de tournesol, basilic 1.7 %, _fromage_, huile d'olive, sel, jus de citron concentré, ail) - roquette - _beurre_.

Mozzarella Sandwich

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sandwich Tomate Mozza or Mozzarella Sandwich?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mozzarella Sandwich has fewer calories: 234 kcal versus 255 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sandwich Tomate Mozza has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons