Sandwich jambon cheddar vs Chicken burger boucherie x2
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sandwich jambon cheddar | Chicken burger boucherie x2 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 221 kcal | 168 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 6.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 3.9 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 6.8 g | 5.6 g |
| Additives | 14 | 14 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Mustard | Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Sesame seeds, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chicken burger boucherie x2 has 24% fewer calories (168 kcal vs 221 kcal).
- Chicken burger boucherie x2 has 36% less fat (6.4 g vs 10 g).
- Sandwich jambon cheddar has 30% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 3 g).
- Sandwich jambon cheddar has 21% less sugar (3.1 g vs 3.9 g).
- Chicken burger boucherie x2 has 42% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Sandwich jambon cheddar has 18% more protein (6.8 g vs 5.6 g).
- Only Sandwich jambon cheddar lists: Eggs.
- Only Chicken burger boucherie x2 lists: Fish, Sesame seeds, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Sandwich jambon cheddar
Galette de blé aux graines de lin (47,4%) : farine de blé, eau, huile de colza, graines de lin 1,1%, poudres à lever : E500-E450, dextrose, acidifiant E296, sel. Garniture : Sauce burger 17,4% : huile de colza, eau, moutarde, (eau, vinaigre, graines de moutarde, sel, acidifiant E330, sucre, épice, antioxydant : disulfite de potassium, extraits naturels d'épices), sucre, vinaigre, concentré de tomates, amidon transformé de pommes de terre, sel, jaune d'oeuf, ail, jus de citron concentré, ciboulette, persil, épaississants : gomme de xanthane-E466, conservateur : sorbate de potassium. Jambon cuit ... 15,8% : jambon de porc origine UE, eau, sel, dextrose sirop de glucose, arôme, stabilisants : E451-E450, antioxydant : erythorbate de sodium, conservateur E250. Salade 7,9%. Cheddar fondu 6,3% : cheddar 3,2%, fromages, eau, protéines de lait, beurre, sels de fonte E331-E452, colorant E160b, sel. Tomates. Traces éventuelles de : poisson, crustacé, sésame, céleri, fruits à coques et soja.
Chicken burger boucherie x2
Pain spécial aux graines de SÉSAME 37,3% (farine de BLÉ, eau, dextrose, levure, graines de SÉSAME , huile de colza, sel, farine de fèves, émulsifiants : E471 et E481, antioxydant : E300), préparation de viande de filets de poulet reconstitués cuits traités en salaison 36,7% (viande de filets de poulet, eau, sel), sauce hamburger [eau, tomato ketchup (concentré de tomate, sirop de glucose-fructose, vinaigre d'alcool, sucre, amidon transformé, sel, acidifiant : E270, épices), huile de colza, MOUTARDE douce (eau, graines de MOUTARDE , vinaigre, sel, épice, arômes, conservateur : SULFITE acide de sodium), cornichons (cornichons, vinaigre, sel), sucre, amidon transformé, vinaigre d'alcool, concentré de tomates, oignons, sel, conservateur : E202, arôme naturel, colorant : E160c], CHEDDAR orange fondu 10% (CHEDDAR orange 5% minimum, FROMAGES, eau, BEURRE, protéines de LAIT, amidon transformé, sels de fonte : E331 et E452, LACTOSERUM, sel, arôme, gélifiant : E407, colorant : E160b), cornichon au vinaigre 2,7% (cornichons, eau, vinaigre d'alcool, sel, affermissant : E509, conservateur : disulfite de potassium). Cette recette contient : gluten, LAIT, MOUTARDE, graines de SÉSAME, SULFITES. Traces possiBLÉs d'œuf, poisson, soja, fruits à coque.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sandwich jambon cheddar or Chicken burger boucherie x2?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chicken burger boucherie x2 has fewer calories: 168 kcal versus 221 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sandwich jambon cheddar has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.