Sandwich de nata vs Sándwich de nata sin azúcares
Overall, Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Sandwich de nata
Sándwich de nata sin azúcares
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sandwich de nata | Sándwich de nata sin azúcare... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 276 kcal | 216 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 6.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 23 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 6.1 g |
| Protein | 4.1 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 8 | 14 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Gluten, Milk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has 22% fewer calories (216 kcal vs 276 kcal).
- Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has 36% less fat (6.4 g vs 10 g).
- Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has 38% less saturated fat (4 g vs 6.5 g).
- Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has 78% less sugar (5 g vs 23 g).
- Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has 23% more protein (5.3 g vs 4.1 g).
- Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sandwich de nata
cream cream sandwich ice cream and biscuit flavour, cream flavoured ice cream (67%), ingredients: reconstituted skimmed milk, sugar, water, vegetable fats (coconut, palm), lactose and milk proteins, glucose and fructose syrup, emulsifier (monoglycerides and diglycerides of fatty acids), stabilisers (locust bean, guar gum, carrageenan), flavouring, biscuits (33%), ingredients: wheat flour, sugar, palm fat, glucose syrup, raising agents (sodium carbonates, ammonium carbonates), salt, colour (e 150c), flavouring, antioxidant (sodium metabisulfite), emulsifier (lecithins (sunflower)), traces of soybeans and mustard,
Sándwich de nata sin azúcares
leche desnatada reconstituida, galletas (con edulcorantes) (31%) (harina de trigo, edulcorantes (maltitoles), grasa de palma, leche desnatada en polvo, gluten de trigo, gasificantes (carbonatos de amonio, carbonatos de sodio), sal, aroma, antioxidante (metabisulfito sódico), emulgente (lecitinas (girasol), edulcorantes (maltitoles, eritritol, sucralosa), fibra alimentaria soluble, leche desnatada en polvo, grasas vegetales (coco, palma), agente de carga (polidextrosa), emulgentes (ésteres de propano-1,2-diol de ácidos grasos, monoglicéridos y diglicéridos de ácidos grasos), gelatina, aroma natural de leche, estabilizantes (goma garrofín, goma guar), aromas, colorante (riboflavina). Trazas de soja y mostaza.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sandwich de nata or Sándwich de nata sin azúcares?
Overall, Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has fewer calories: 216 kcal versus 276 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has less sugar: 5 g versus 23 g per 100 g.