Sándwich de nata sin azúcares vs Cornetto go
Overall, Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sándwich de nata sin azúcare... | Cornetto go |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 216 kcal | 311 kcal |
| Fat | 6.4 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 7.7 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 25 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 6.1 g | — |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 5.6 g |
| Additives | 14 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has 31% fewer calories (216 kcal vs 311 kcal).
- Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has 47% less fat (6.4 g vs 12 g).
- Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has 48% less saturated fat (4 g vs 7.7 g).
- Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has 80% less sugar (5 g vs 25 g).
- Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has 48% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.7 g).
- Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sándwich de nata sin azúcares lists: Gluten, Milk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Sándwich de nata sin azúcares
leche desnatada reconstituida, galletas (con edulcorantes) (31%) (harina de trigo, edulcorantes (maltitoles), grasa de palma, leche desnatada en polvo, gluten de trigo, gasificantes (carbonatos de amonio, carbonatos de sodio), sal, aroma, antioxidante (metabisulfito sódico), emulgente (lecitinas (girasol), edulcorantes (maltitoles, eritritol, sucralosa), fibra alimentaria soluble, leche desnatada en polvo, grasas vegetales (coco, palma), agente de carga (polidextrosa), emulgentes (ésteres de propano-1,2-diol de ácidos grasos, monoglicéridos y diglicéridos de ácidos grasos), gelatina, aroma natural de leche, estabilizantes (goma garrofín, goma guar), aromas, colorante (riboflavina). Trazas de soja y mostaza.
Cornetto go
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sándwich de nata sin azúcares or Cornetto go?
Overall, Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has fewer calories: 216 kcal versus 311 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sándwich de nata sin azúcares has less sugar: 5 g versus 25 g per 100 g.