Comparison

Salade de Quinoa noir et rouge au poulet vs Salade de riz noir bio, poulet et butternut

Overall, Salade de riz noir bio, poulet et butternut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalade de Quinoa noir et rou...Salade de riz noir bio, poul...
Nutri-Score e a
NOVA group — —
Calories 305 kcal 139 kcal
Fat 14 g 6 g
Saturated fat 6.7 g 1 g
Sugars 14.4 g 2 g
Salt 2 g 0 g
Protein 12 g 9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salade de riz noir bio, poulet et butternut has 54% fewer calories (139 kcal vs 305 kcal).
  • Salade de riz noir bio, poulet et butternut has 57% less fat (6 g vs 14 g).
  • Salade de riz noir bio, poulet et butternut has 85% less saturated fat (1 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Salade de riz noir bio, poulet et butternut has 86% less sugar (2 g vs 14.4 g).
  • Salade de riz noir bio, poulet et butternut has no salt, while Salade de Quinoa noir et rouge au poulet has 2 g.
  • Salade de Quinoa noir et rouge au poulet has 25% more protein (12 g vs 9 g).
  • Salade de riz noir bio, poulet et butternut has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Salade de Quinoa noir et rouge au poulet

Not available.

Salade de riz noir bio, poulet et butternut

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salade de Quinoa noir et rouge au poulet or Salade de riz noir bio, poulet et butternut?

Overall, Salade de riz noir bio, poulet et butternut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salade de riz noir bio, poulet et butternut has fewer calories: 139 kcal versus 305 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salade de riz noir bio, poulet et butternut has less sugar: 2 g versus 14.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons