Comparison

Salade Coleslaw 300g vs Coleslaw

Overall, Salade Coleslaw 300g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalade Coleslaw 300gColeslaw
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 104 kcal 106 kcal
Fat 7.6 g 8.5 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.6 g
Sugars 5.9 g 5.5 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.1 g
Fiber 2.2 g 2.2 g
Protein 1.3 g 0.8 g
Additives24
AllergensEggs, Milk, MustardEggs, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salade Coleslaw 300g has 11% less fat (7.6 g vs 8.5 g).
  • Salade Coleslaw 300g has 38% more protein (1.3 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Only Salade Coleslaw 300g lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Salade Coleslaw 300g

Chou blanc 44%, carotte 29%, huile de colza, eau, fromage blanc, oignon, sucre, vinaigre d'alcool, jus d'orange concentré, sel, moutarde (eau, graines de moutarde, vinaigre d'alcool, sel), amidon transformé de pomme de terre, épaississant : gomme xanthane, jaune d'oeuf en poudre, poivre. Traces éventuelles de céleri, céréales contenant du gluten, crustacés, graines de sésame et poissons.

Coleslaw

Chou blanc 46%; carotte 30%; eau; huile de colza; vinaigre d'alcool; oignon; sucre ; sel; moutarde (eau, graines de moutarde, vinaigre d'alcool, sel); amidon modifié de pomme de terre; conservateur: E202; épaississant: gomme xanthane; antioxydant: acide ascorbique; jaune d'oeuf en poudre ; poivre ; sirop de glucose. Traces de céleri, gluten, fruits à coque et lait.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salade Coleslaw 300g or Coleslaw?

Overall, Salade Coleslaw 300g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salade Coleslaw 300g has fewer calories: 104 kcal versus 106 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Coleslaw has less sugar: 5.5 g versus 5.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons