Coleslaw vs Salade Coleslaw 300g
Overall, Coleslaw has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coleslaw | Salade Coleslaw 300g |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 93 kcal | 104 kcal |
| Fat | 6.8 g | 7.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 5.3 g | 5.9 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Mustard | Eggs, Milk, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coleslaw has 11% fewer calories (93 kcal vs 104 kcal).
- Coleslaw has 11% less fat (6.8 g vs 7.6 g).
- Coleslaw has 10% less sugar (5.3 g vs 5.9 g).
- Salade Coleslaw 300g has 46% more protein (1.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Only Salade Coleslaw 300g lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Coleslaw
Chou blanc 42%, carotte 31%, eau, huile de colza, sucre, oignon 2%, vinaigre d'alcool, moutarde de Dijon (eau, graines de moutarde, vinaigre d'alcool, sel), sel, jaune d'oeuf, épaississant : gomme de xanthane, conservateur : sorbate de potassium.
Salade Coleslaw 300g
Chou blanc 44%, carotte 29%, huile de colza, eau, fromage blanc, oignon, sucre, vinaigre d'alcool, jus d'orange concentré, sel, moutarde (eau, graines de moutarde, vinaigre d'alcool, sel), amidon transformé de pomme de terre, épaississant : gomme xanthane, jaune d'oeuf en poudre, poivre. Traces éventuelles de céleri, céréales contenant du gluten, crustacés, graines de sésame et poissons.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coleslaw or Salade Coleslaw 300g?
Overall, Coleslaw has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coleslaw has fewer calories: 93 kcal versus 104 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coleslaw has less sugar: 5.3 g versus 5.9 g per 100 g.