Comparison
Safran poudre vs Safranfäden
Overall, Safranfäden has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Safran poudre | Safranfäden |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 569 kcal | 352 kcal |
| Fat | 53 g | 5.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 35 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 42.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 11.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Safranfäden has 38% fewer calories (352 kcal vs 569 kcal).
- Safranfäden has 89% less fat (5.9 g vs 53 g).
- Safranfäden has 95% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 35 g).
- Safran poudre has no sugar, while Safranfäden has 42.4 g.
- Safranfäden has 74% more fiber (3.9 g vs 1 g).
- Safran poudre has 50% more protein (23 g vs 11.4 g).
Ingredients
Safran poudre
Not available.
Safranfäden
Safran
FAQ
Which is healthier: Safran poudre or Safranfäden?
Overall, Safranfäden has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Safranfäden has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 569 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Safran poudre has less sugar: 0 g versus 42.4 g per 100 g.