Comparison
Azafrán en hebra vs Safran poudre
Overall, Azafrán en hebra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Azafrán en hebra | Safran poudre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 368 kcal | 569 kcal |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 53 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 35 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1 g |
| Protein | 11.4 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Azafrán en hebra has 35% fewer calories (368 kcal vs 569 kcal).
- Azafrán en hebra has 89% less fat (5.9 g vs 53 g).
- Azafrán en hebra has no saturated fat, while Safran poudre has 35 g.
- Safran poudre has 50% more protein (23 g vs 11.4 g).
Ingredients
Azafrán en hebra
Not available.
Safran poudre
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Azafrán en hebra or Safran poudre?
Overall, Azafrán en hebra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Azafrán en hebra has fewer calories: 368 kcal versus 569 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Azafrán en hebra has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.