Comparison
Azafrán en hebra vs Safran
Overall, Azafrán en hebra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Azafrán en hebra | Safran |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 368 kcal | 210 kcal |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 15.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 20 g |
| Protein | 11.4 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Safran has 43% fewer calories (210 kcal vs 368 kcal).
- Azafrán en hebra has 62% less fat (5.9 g vs 15.5 g).
- Azafrán en hebra has no saturated fat, while Safran has 9 g.
- Azafrán en hebra has no sugar, while Safran has 10 g.
- Azafrán en hebra has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 20 g).
- Azafrán en hebra has 21% more protein (11.4 g vs 9 g).
Ingredients
Azafrán en hebra
Not available.
Safran
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Azafrán en hebra or Safran?
Overall, Azafrán en hebra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Safran has fewer calories: 210 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Azafrán en hebra has less sugar: 0 g versus 10 g per 100 g.