Royal mints vs Chocolate mints
Overall, Chocolate mints has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Royal mints
Chocolate mints
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Royal mints | Chocolate mints |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 467 kcal | 456 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 63.3 g | 61 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 5 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chocolate mints has 15% less fat (17 g vs 20 g).
- Chocolate mints has 33% less saturated fat (10 g vs 15 g).
- Royal mints has 100% more fiber (3.3 g vs 0 g).
- Chocolate mints has 100% more protein (4 g vs 0 g).
- Only Chocolate mints lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Royal mints
Azúcar, pasta de cacao, jarabe de glucosa, manteca de cacao, emulgente (lecitina de girasol), humectante (invertasa), aceite de menta, gelificante (agar-agar), acidulante (ácido cítrico).
Chocolate mints
Zartbitterschokolade 51% [Kakaomasse, Zucker, Kakaobutter, Emulgator E322 (Soja)] Füllung 49% (Zucker, Glukosesirup, Feuchthaltemittel:E1103, natürliches Pfefferminzöl ,lt,1%, Geliermittel: E406, Sauerungsmittel: E330, Salz)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Royal mints or Chocolate mints?
Overall, Chocolate mints has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocolate mints has fewer calories: 456 kcal versus 467 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolate mints has less sugar: 61 g versus 63.3 g per 100 g.