Comparison

Royal mints vs After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins

Overall, After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRoyal mintsAfter Eight Dark Chocolate T...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 467 kcal 426 kcal
Fat 20 g 12.9 g
Saturated fat 15 g 7.6 g
Sugars 63.3 g 67.8 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 3.3 g 2.8 g
Protein 0 g 2.1 g
Additives53
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins has 36% less fat (12.9 g vs 20 g).
  • After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins has 49% less saturated fat (7.6 g vs 15 g).
  • Royal mints has 16% more fiber (3.3 g vs 2.8 g).
  • After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins has 100% more protein (2.1 g vs 0 g).
  • Only After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Royal mints

Azúcar, pasta de cacao, jarabe de glucosa, manteca de cacao, emulgente (lecitina de girasol), humectante (invertasa), aceite de menta, gelificante (agar-agar), acidulante (ácido cítrico).

After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins

sugar, cocoa mass, glucose syrup, cocoa butter, butterfat (_MILK_), skimmed _MILK_ powder, _WHEY_ powder, stabiliser invertase, emulsifier lecithins, peppermint oil, salt, acid citric acid.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Royal mints or After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins?

Overall, After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins has fewer calories: 426 kcal versus 467 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Royal mints has less sugar: 63.3 g versus 67.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons