Comparison

After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins vs Chocolate mints

Overall, After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAfter Eight Dark Chocolate T...Chocolate mints
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 426 kcal 456 kcal
Fat 12.9 g 17 g
Saturated fat 7.6 g 10 g
Sugars 67.8 g 61 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.8 g 0 g
Protein 2.1 g 4 g
Additives34
AllergensMilkSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins has 24% less fat (12.9 g vs 17 g).
  • After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins has 24% less saturated fat (7.6 g vs 10 g).
  • Chocolate mints has 10% less sugar (61 g vs 67.8 g).
  • After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins has 100% more fiber (2.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Chocolate mints has 48% more protein (4 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Only After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins lists: Milk.
  • Only Chocolate mints lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins

sugar, cocoa mass, glucose syrup, cocoa butter, butterfat (_MILK_), skimmed _MILK_ powder, _WHEY_ powder, stabiliser invertase, emulsifier lecithins, peppermint oil, salt, acid citric acid.

Chocolate mints

Zartbitterschokolade 51% [Kakaomasse, Zucker, Kakaobutter, Emulgator E322 (Soja)] Füllung 49% (Zucker, Glukosesirup, Feuchthaltemittel:E1103, natürliches Pfefferminzöl ,lt,1%, Geliermittel: E406, Sauerungsmittel: E330, Salz)

FAQ

Which is healthier: After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins or Chocolate mints?

Overall, After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

After Eight Dark Chocolate Thins has fewer calories: 426 kcal versus 456 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolate mints has less sugar: 61 g versus 67.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons