Comparison

AFTER EIGHT Coffret 300g vs Chocolate mints

Overall, AFTER EIGHT Coffret 300g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAFTER EIGHT Coffret 300gChocolate mints
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 426 kcal 456 kcal
Fat 13.3 g 17 g
Saturated fat 7.6 g 10 g
Sugars 66.2 g 61 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.8 g 0 g
Protein 2.2 g 4 g
Additives34
AllergensMilk, NutsSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • AFTER EIGHT Coffret 300g has 22% less fat (13.3 g vs 17 g).
  • AFTER EIGHT Coffret 300g has 24% less saturated fat (7.6 g vs 10 g).
  • AFTER EIGHT Coffret 300g has 100% more fiber (2.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Chocolate mints has 45% more protein (4 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Only AFTER EIGHT Coffret 300g lists: Milk, Nuts.
  • Only Chocolate mints lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

AFTER EIGHT Coffret 300g

Sucre, pâte de cacao, sirop de glucose, matières grasses végétales (palme, karité, palmiste), beurre de cacao, matière grasse de LAIT anhydre, émulsifiant (lécithines), stabilisant (invertase), huile essentielle de menthe poivrée, acidifiant (acide citrique). Peut contenir : ARACHIDES, FRUITS A COQUE (NOISETTES) et LAIT.

Chocolate mints

Zartbitterschokolade 51% [Kakaomasse, Zucker, Kakaobutter, Emulgator E322 (Soja)] Füllung 49% (Zucker, Glukosesirup, Feuchthaltemittel:E1103, natürliches Pfefferminzöl ,lt,1%, Geliermittel: E406, Sauerungsmittel: E330, Salz)

FAQ

Which is healthier: AFTER EIGHT Coffret 300g or Chocolate mints?

Overall, AFTER EIGHT Coffret 300g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

AFTER EIGHT Coffret 300g has fewer calories: 426 kcal versus 456 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolate mints has less sugar: 61 g versus 66.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons