Comparison

Rouille à la sétoise Coudène vs Rouille bio au curcuma

Overall, Rouille bio au curcuma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRouille à la sétoise CoudèneRouille bio au curcuma
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 797 kcal 330 kcal
Fat 87 g 32.5 g
Saturated fat 11 g 4 g
Sugars 0.5 g 3 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.4 g
Fiber 0.2 g —
Protein 1 g 2.7 g
Additives20
AllergensEggs, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rouille bio au curcuma has 59% fewer calories (330 kcal vs 797 kcal).
  • Rouille bio au curcuma has 63% less fat (32.5 g vs 87 g).
  • Rouille bio au curcuma has 64% less saturated fat (4 g vs 11 g).
  • Rouille à la sétoise Coudène has 83% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3 g).
  • Rouille bio au curcuma has 63% more protein (2.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Rouille bio au curcuma has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Rouille à la sétoise Coudène lists: Eggs, Mustard.

Ingredients

Rouille à la sétoise Coudène

Huile de colza, jaune d'oeuf 4,49%, ail, moutarde (eau, graines de moutarde, vinaigre d'alcool, sel), jus de citron concentré, piment, safran, sel, colorant: extrait de paprika, conservateur: sorbate de potassium.

Rouille bio au curcuma

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rouille à la sétoise Coudène or Rouille bio au curcuma?

Overall, Rouille bio au curcuma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rouille bio au curcuma has fewer calories: 330 kcal versus 797 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rouille à la sétoise Coudène has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons