Comparison

Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) vs Roti de porc aux herbes

Overall, Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Fil...Roti de porc aux herbes
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 119 kcal 139 kcal
Fat 3 g 5.2 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 2.1 g
Sugars 0.9 g 0.8 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.9 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 22 g 22 g
Additives30
AllergensMaïsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) has 15% fewer calories (119 kcal vs 139 kcal).
  • Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) has 42% less fat (3 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) has 48% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Roti de porc aux herbes has 94% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) lists: Maïs.

Ingredients

Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches)

Filet de porc, sel, bouillon (eau, ail, plantes aromatiques 0,1%), dextrose de maïs, poivre 0,1%, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, colorant, caramel

Roti de porc aux herbes

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) or Roti de porc aux herbes?

Overall, Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) has fewer calories: 119 kcal versus 139 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Roti de porc aux herbes has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons