Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) vs Roti de porc
Overall, Roti de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches)
Roti de porc
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Fil... | Roti de porc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 119 kcal | 51 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 22 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Maïs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Roti de porc has 57% fewer calories (51 kcal vs 119 kcal).
- Roti de porc has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Roti de porc has 50% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.8 g).
- Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) has 95% more protein (22 g vs 1 g).
- Only Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) lists: Maïs.
Ingredients
Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches)
Filet de porc, sel, bouillon (eau, ail, plantes aromatiques 0,1%), dextrose de maïs, poivre 0,1%, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, colorant, caramel
Roti de porc
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rôti de Porc cuit, 100 % Filet (2 Tranches) or Roti de porc?
Overall, Roti de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Roti de porc has fewer calories: 51 kcal versus 119 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Roti de porc has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.