Rote bete vs Remolacha agridulce en rodajas
Overall, Rote bete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rote bete | Remolacha agridulce en rodaj... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 44 kcal | 70 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 7.4 g | 9.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rote bete has 37% fewer calories (44 kcal vs 70 kcal).
- Rote bete has no fat, while Remolacha agridulce en rodajas has 0.5 g.
- Rote bete has 20% less sugar (7.4 g vs 9.3 g).
- Rote bete has no salt, while Remolacha agridulce en rodajas has 1.2 g.
- Rote bete has 53% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.7 g).
Ingredients
Rote bete
Rote Bete
Remolacha agridulce en rodajas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rote bete or Remolacha agridulce en rodajas?
Overall, Rote bete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rote bete has fewer calories: 44 kcal versus 70 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rote bete has less sugar: 7.4 g versus 9.3 g per 100 g.