Comparison

Rote bete vs Remolacha agridulce en rodajas

Overall, Rote bete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRote beteRemolacha agridulce en rodaj...
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — —
Calories 44 kcal 70 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat — 0.1 g
Sugars 7.4 g 9.3 g
Salt 0 g 1.2 g
Protein 1.5 g 0.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rote bete has 37% fewer calories (44 kcal vs 70 kcal).
  • Rote bete has no fat, while Remolacha agridulce en rodajas has 0.5 g.
  • Rote bete has 20% less sugar (7.4 g vs 9.3 g).
  • Rote bete has no salt, while Remolacha agridulce en rodajas has 1.2 g.
  • Rote bete has 53% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.7 g).

Ingredients

Rote bete

Rote Bete

Remolacha agridulce en rodajas

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rote bete or Remolacha agridulce en rodajas?

Overall, Rote bete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rote bete has fewer calories: 44 kcal versus 70 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rote bete has less sugar: 7.4 g versus 9.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons