Rosette pur porc tranchée sans peau vs Rosette bio tranchée fin
Overall, Rosette bio tranchée fin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rosette pur porc tranchée sa... | Rosette bio tranchée fin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 431 kcal | 295 kcal |
| Fat | 35.5 g | 19.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 12.9 g | 6.9 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 4.4 g | 4.7 g |
| Protein | 25.1 g | 29.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rosette bio tranchée fin has 32% fewer calories (295 kcal vs 431 kcal).
- Rosette bio tranchée fin has 45% less fat (19.5 g vs 35.5 g).
- Rosette bio tranchée fin has 47% less saturated fat (6.9 g vs 12.9 g).
- Rosette bio tranchée fin has 95% less sugar (0.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Rosette bio tranchée fin has 15% more protein (29.7 g vs 25.1 g).
Ingredients
Rosette pur porc tranchée sans peau
Not available.
Rosette bio tranchée fin
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rosette pur porc tranchée sans peau or Rosette bio tranchée fin?
Overall, Rosette bio tranchée fin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rosette bio tranchée fin has fewer calories: 295 kcal versus 431 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rosette bio tranchée fin has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.