Rosette bio tranchée fin vs Rosette En Tranches
Overall, Rosette bio tranchée fin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rosette bio tranchée fin | Rosette En Tranches |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 295 kcal | 368 kcal |
| Fat | 19.5 g | — |
| Saturated fat | 6.9 g | 10.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 4.7 g | 4.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 29.7 g | 26.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rosette bio tranchée fin has 20% fewer calories (295 kcal vs 368 kcal).
- Rosette bio tranchée fin has 35% less saturated fat (6.9 g vs 10.6 g).
- Rosette bio tranchée fin has 75% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Rosette bio tranchée fin has 12% more protein (29.7 g vs 26.1 g).
Ingredients
Rosette bio tranchée fin
Not available.
Rosette En Tranches
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rosette bio tranchée fin or Rosette En Tranches?
Overall, Rosette bio tranchée fin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rosette bio tranchée fin has fewer calories: 295 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rosette bio tranchée fin has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.