Comparison

Rosette bio tranchée fin vs Rosette En Tranches

Overall, Rosette bio tranchée fin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRosette bio tranchée finRosette En Tranches
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group — —
Calories 295 kcal 368 kcal
Fat 19.5 g —
Saturated fat 6.9 g 10.6 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0.4 g
Salt 4.7 g 4.9 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 29.7 g 26.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rosette bio tranchée fin has 20% fewer calories (295 kcal vs 368 kcal).
  • Rosette bio tranchée fin has 35% less saturated fat (6.9 g vs 10.6 g).
  • Rosette bio tranchée fin has 75% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Rosette bio tranchée fin has 12% more protein (29.7 g vs 26.1 g).

Ingredients

Rosette bio tranchée fin

Not available.

Rosette En Tranches

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rosette bio tranchée fin or Rosette En Tranches?

Overall, Rosette bio tranchée fin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rosette bio tranchée fin has fewer calories: 295 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rosette bio tranchée fin has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons