Rosette pur porc tranchée gros diamétre sans peau vs Rosette bio tranchée fin
Overall, Rosette bio tranchée fin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rosette pur porc tranchée gr... | Rosette bio tranchée fin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 431 kcal | 295 kcal |
| Fat | 35.5 g | 19.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 12.9 g | 6.9 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 4.4 g | 4.7 g |
| Protein | 25.1 g | 29.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rosette bio tranchée fin has 32% fewer calories (295 kcal vs 431 kcal).
- Rosette bio tranchée fin has 45% less fat (19.5 g vs 35.5 g).
- Rosette bio tranchée fin has 47% less saturated fat (6.9 g vs 12.9 g).
- Rosette bio tranchée fin has 95% less sugar (0.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Rosette bio tranchée fin has 15% more protein (29.7 g vs 25.1 g).
Ingredients
Rosette pur porc tranchée gros diamétre sans peau
Not available.
Rosette bio tranchée fin
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rosette pur porc tranchée gros diamétre sans peau or Rosette bio tranchée fin?
Overall, Rosette bio tranchée fin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rosette bio tranchée fin has fewer calories: 295 kcal versus 431 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rosette bio tranchée fin has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.