Romans de Romans vs Fromage frais au lait de brebis bio
Overall, Fromage frais au lait de brebis bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Romans de Romans
Fromage frais au lait de brebis bio
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Romans de Romans | Fromage frais au lait de bre... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 224 kcal | 250 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 15 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Romans de Romans has 10% fewer calories (224 kcal vs 250 kcal).
- Fromage frais au lait de brebis bio has no saturated fat, while Romans de Romans has 15 g.
- Fromage frais au lait de brebis bio has no sugar, while Romans de Romans has 2.5 g.
- Fromage frais au lait de brebis bio has no salt, while Romans de Romans has 1 g.
- Fromage frais au lait de brebis bio has 100% more fiber (15 g vs 0 g).
- Fromage frais au lait de brebis bio has 33% more protein (15 g vs 10 g).
- Fromage frais au lait de brebis bio has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Romans de Romans
_lait_ de vache thermisé, sel, ferments lactiques (_lait_), présure animale.
Fromage frais au lait de brebis bio
_Fromage_ frais de brebis gras, ail des ours, sel de cuisine, culture.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Romans de Romans or Fromage frais au lait de brebis bio?
Overall, Fromage frais au lait de brebis bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Romans de Romans has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fromage frais au lait de brebis bio has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.