Rollmops vs Rollmps
Overall, Rollmps has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rollmops | Rollmps |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 122 kcal | 114 kcal |
| Fat | 6.8 g | 6.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 1 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rollmps has 33% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2.4 g).
Ingredients
Rollmops
Not available.
Rollmps
Rollmops 51% hareng (Quped ha Pengus) 70%, oignons 30%], eau, vinaigre d'alcool 1,6%, sel, arôme nature ORIGINE: 4027.1la mer de Norvège /FAO27.IVa mer du Nord septentrionale FA027.Vbrer du Nord centrale. Engin de pêche: filets tournants et filets soulevés chaluts. Peut contenir: céréales contenant du gluten, oeufs, lait, céleri, moutarde, mollusques Gerother Hering met Zwiebeln in Essig. ZUTATEN: Rollmops 51% [Hering (Cup Mittlere Nordsee. Fischfanggerät: Umschließungsnetze und Hebenetze-Schleppet HERKUNFT: FA027.1la Norwegische See/ FAO27.IVa Nördliche Nordsee/FA027 Mb harengus) 70%, Zwiebeln 30%], Wasser, Branntweinessig 1,6%, Salz, natürlich Aroma Kann glutenhaltige Getreide, Eier, Milch, Sellerie, Senf und Weichtiere enthalten
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rollmops or Rollmps?
Overall, Rollmps has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rollmps has fewer calories: 114 kcal versus 122 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rollmops has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.