Comparison

Rohrohr Zucker vs Zucchero integrale di canna

Overall, Zucchero integrale di canna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Rohrohr Zucker	Zucchero integrale di canna
Nutri-Score	e	—
NOVA group	2	2
Calories	390 kcal	392 kcal
Fat	0 g	0 g
Saturated fat	0 g	0 g
Sugars	97.4 g	97.6 g
Salt	0 g	—
Fiber	0 g	—
Protein	0 g	0.3 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Zucchero integrale di canna has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Rohrohr Zucker

Bio-Rohrohrzucker

Zucchero integrale di canna

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rohrohr Zucker or Zucchero integrale di canna?

Overall, Zucchero integrale di canna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rohrohr Zucker has fewer calories: 390 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rohrohr Zucker has less sugar: 97.4 g versus 97.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Sucre Muscovado brun vs Rohrohr Zucker Mascabado genuino vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Muscovado vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Sucre Muscovado brun vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Rohrohr Zucker vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Rohrohr Zucker vs Azucar mascavado Azucar mascavado vs Zucchero integrale di ca...