Rode Bieten sap vs Šťáva z červené řepy
Overall, Rode Bieten sap has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Rode Bieten sap | Šťáva z červené řepy |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 44 kcal | 43 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rode Bieten sap has 75% less sugar (2 g vs 8 g).
- Šťáva z červené řepy has 80% more fiber (2.6 g vs 0.5 g).
- Rode Bieten sap has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rode Bieten sap
Not available.
Šťáva z červené řepy
100% BIO šťáva z červené řepy
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rode Bieten sap or Šťáva z červené řepy?
Overall, Rode Bieten sap has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Šťáva z červené řepy has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rode Bieten sap has less sugar: 2 g versus 8 g per 100 g.