Bio Rote Bete Saft vs Rode Bieten sap
Overall, Bio Rote Bete Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Bio Rote Bete Saft | Rode Bieten sap |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 35 kcal | 44 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7.5 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Rote Bete Saft has 20% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 44 kcal).
- Bio Rote Bete Saft has no fat, while Rode Bieten sap has 0.5 g.
- Rode Bieten sap has 73% less sugar (2 g vs 7.5 g).
Ingredients
Bio Rote Bete Saft
Not available.
Rode Bieten sap
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Rote Bete Saft or Rode Bieten sap?
Overall, Bio Rote Bete Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Rote Bete Saft has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rode Bieten sap has less sugar: 2 g versus 7.5 g per 100 g.