Comparison

Bio Rote Bete Saft vs Rode Bieten sap

Overall, Bio Rote Bete Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientBio Rote Bete SaftRode Bieten sap
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — —
Calories 35 kcal 44 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 7.5 g 2 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 0.5 g
Protein 1 g 1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio Rote Bete Saft has 20% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 44 kcal).
  • Bio Rote Bete Saft has no fat, while Rode Bieten sap has 0.5 g.
  • Rode Bieten sap has 73% less sugar (2 g vs 7.5 g).

Ingredients

Bio Rote Bete Saft

Not available.

Rode Bieten sap

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio Rote Bete Saft or Rode Bieten sap?

Overall, Bio Rote Bete Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio Rote Bete Saft has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rode Bieten sap has less sugar: 2 g versus 7.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons