Comparison

Rote Bete-Saft vs Rode Bieten sap

Overall, Rode Bieten sap has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientRote Bete-SaftRode Bieten sap
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 36 kcal 44 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 8 g 2 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.5 g
Protein 1 g 1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rote Bete-Saft has 18% fewer calories (36 kcal vs 44 kcal).
  • Rode Bieten sap has 75% less sugar (2 g vs 8 g).
  • Rode Bieten sap has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Rote Bete-Saft

Rote Bete Saft*. *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft

Rode Bieten sap

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rote Bete-Saft or Rode Bieten sap?

Overall, Rode Bieten sap has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rote Bete-Saft has fewer calories: 36 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rode Bieten sap has less sugar: 2 g versus 8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons