Rote Beete Saft vs Rode Bieten sap
Overall, Rode Bieten sap has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Rote Beete Saft | Rode Bieten sap |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 36 kcal | 44 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 8 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rote Beete Saft has 18% fewer calories (36 kcal vs 44 kcal).
- Rode Bieten sap has 75% less sugar (2 g vs 8 g).
- Rode Bieten sap has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rote Beete Saft
Rote-Bete-Saft*¹ * aus biologisch-dynamischer Landwirtschaft ¹ milchsauer vergoren
Rode Bieten sap
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rote Beete Saft or Rode Bieten sap?
Overall, Rode Bieten sap has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rote Beete Saft has fewer calories: 36 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rode Bieten sap has less sugar: 2 g versus 8 g per 100 g.