Comparison
Rocamadour AOp vs Rocamadour
Overall, Rocamadour AOp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rocamadour AOp | Rocamadour |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 279 kcal | 268 kcal |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 21.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.5 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 15.8 g | 16.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rocamadour AOp has 16% less saturated fat (13.5 g vs 16 g).
Ingredients
Rocamadour AOp
Not available.
Rocamadour
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rocamadour AOp or Rocamadour?
Overall, Rocamadour AOp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rocamadour has fewer calories: 268 kcal versus 279 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rocamadour AOp has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.