Comparison

Rocamadour AOP 3x35g vs Rocamadour AOp

Overall, Rocamadour AOP 3x35g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRocamadour AOP 3x35gRocamadour AOp
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 292 kcal 279 kcal
Fat 24 g 22.5 g
Saturated fat 17 g 13.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 1 g 1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 18 g 15.8 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rocamadour AOp has 21% less saturated fat (13.5 g vs 17 g).
  • Rocamadour AOP 3x35g has 12% more protein (18 g vs 15.8 g).
  • Rocamadour AOP 3x35g has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Rocamadour AOP 3x35g lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Rocamadour AOP 3x35g

lait cru de chèvre, ferments (contient lait), sel, présure.

Rocamadour AOp

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rocamadour AOP 3x35g or Rocamadour AOp?

Overall, Rocamadour AOP 3x35g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rocamadour AOp has fewer calories: 279 kcal versus 292 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rocamadour AOP 3x35g has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons