Rocamadour AOP 3x35g vs Rocamadour au lait cru
Overall, Rocamadour AOP 3x35g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Rocamadour AOP 3x35g
Rocamadour au lait cru
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rocamadour AOP 3x35g | Rocamadour au lait cru |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 292 kcal | 270 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rocamadour au lait cru has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Rocamadour AOP 3x35g has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rocamadour AOP 3x35g
lait cru de chèvre, ferments (contient lait), sel, présure.
Rocamadour au lait cru
98,5% lait cru de chèvre, 1,5% sel, présure, ferment (lait).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rocamadour AOP 3x35g or Rocamadour au lait cru?
Overall, Rocamadour AOP 3x35g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rocamadour au lait cru has fewer calories: 270 kcal versus 292 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rocamadour AOP 3x35g has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.