2X35G Rocamadour Fermier Eqc Aoc vs Rocamadour
Overall, 2X35G Rocamadour Fermier Eqc Aoc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 2X35G Rocamadour Fermier Eqc... | Rocamadour |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 279 kcal | 268 kcal |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 21.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.5 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 15.8 g | 16.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 2X35G Rocamadour Fermier Eqc Aoc has 16% less saturated fat (13.5 g vs 16 g).
- 2X35G Rocamadour Fermier Eqc Aoc has no sugar, while Rocamadour has 0.7 g.
- Rocamadour has 40% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.5 g).
Ingredients
2X35G Rocamadour Fermier Eqc Aoc
lait cru entier de chèvre sel, présure ferments.
Rocamadour
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 2X35G Rocamadour Fermier Eqc Aoc or Rocamadour?
Overall, 2X35G Rocamadour Fermier Eqc Aoc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rocamadour has fewer calories: 268 kcal versus 279 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
2X35G Rocamadour Fermier Eqc Aoc has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.