Comparison
Riz Pour Sushi vs Riz à sushi
Overall, Riz à sushi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz Pour Sushi | Riz à sushi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 348 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz à sushi has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Riz Pour Sushi
Riz
Riz à sushi
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz Pour Sushi or Riz à sushi?
Overall, Riz à sushi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz Pour Sushi has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz Pour Sushi has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.