Comparison
Riz gluant vs Kleb Reis
Overall, Riz gluant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz gluant | Kleb Reis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 200 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 4 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz gluant has 43% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 353 kcal).
- Riz gluant has no fat, while Kleb Reis has 0.7 g.
- Riz gluant has no saturated fat, while Kleb Reis has 0.3 g.
- Riz gluant has no sugar, while Kleb Reis has 0.5 g.
- Kleb Reis has 100% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0 g).
- Kleb Reis has 44% more protein (7.2 g vs 4 g).
- Riz gluant has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Riz gluant
Riz
Kleb Reis
Klebreis 100%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz gluant or Kleb Reis?
Overall, Riz gluant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz gluant has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz gluant has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.