Comparison
Riz complet vs Riz Etuve Thailandais
Overall, Riz complet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz complet | Riz Etuve Thailandais |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 351 kcal | 354 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | — |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 7.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz Etuve Thailandais has 65% less fat (1 g vs 2.8 g).
- Riz complet has 66% more fiber (3.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Riz complet has 10% more protein (7.9 g vs 7.1 g).
Ingredients
Riz complet
100% riz long grain complet étuvé de qualité supérieure (origine Italie)
Riz Etuve Thailandais
Riz Étuvé
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz complet or Riz Etuve Thailandais?
Overall, Riz complet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz complet has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz Etuve Thailandais has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.