Comparison
Riz complet vs Riz Etuve Thailandais
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz complet | Riz Etuve Thailandais |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 360 kcal | 354 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | — |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 7.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz Etuve Thailandais has 62% less fat (1 g vs 2.6 g).
- Riz complet has 54% more fiber (2.9 g vs 1.3 g).
Ingredients
Riz complet
Riz long complet étuvé de qualité supérieure.
Riz Etuve Thailandais
Riz Étuvé
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz complet or Riz Etuve Thailandais?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz Etuve Thailandais has fewer calories: 354 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz Etuve Thailandais has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.